The revolutionary Condense energy modeling system took many years to develop, and has been extensively tested through real projects for consulting clients, as well as through controlled testing against theoretical Energy Plus models. Below are summaries of energy modeling case studies across a range of conditions that may be of interest to you.
We tested a large office building with a centralized water cooled chiller. The margin of error of the Condense model versus a traditional full-building Energy Plus model ranged from 0.6% for a hot-humid climate to 1.5% for a cold-dry climate. To read this case study, click here.